The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fracture-related infections following internal osteosynthesis of the extremity: A systematic review.

Autor: Jensen NM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Sygehusvej 22, 6000, Kolding, Denmark., Steenstrup S; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Sygehusvej 22, 6000, Kolding, Denmark., Ravn C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kolding Hospital Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Sygehusvej 22, 6000, Kolding, Denmark., Schmal H; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany., Viberg B; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsloewsvej 4, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma [J Clin Orthop Trauma] 2021 Nov 17; Vol. 24, pp. 101710. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 17 (Print Publication: 2022).
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101710
Abstrakt: This study aimed to systematically review the current literature on studies using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or dressings following fracture-related infection (FRI) in internal osteosynthesis of the extremity. Articles were analyzed on fracture and wound healing and included when comparing or describing the use of either NPWT or dressings in FRI. We conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases: Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The studies were screened by two authors using Covidence.org and evaluated for risk of bias. A total of 8576 records were identified. No articles compared NPWT to dressings. Seven case reports and three case series included a total of 115 patients treated for FRI. Fracture healing was achieved in 21 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT (4 amputations and 46 not described) and all 48 patients in the dressing group (4 patients needed additional sequestrectomy procedures). Five studies did not describe fracture healing. In 57 out of 67 patients treated with NPWT, the wounds were described as healed, closed, or requiring soft tissue reconstruction (4 amputations and six lacking description). The dressing group had complete wound coverage in 18 patients and partial coverage in 30 patients. Studies were generally at high risk of bias because of insufficient descriptions of both patient demographics and outcomes. No studies compared NPWT to dressings, and the existing literature is at high risk of bias. The included studies were of low-level evidence. NPWT can be neither recommended nor advised against to cover infected osteosynthesis.
Competing Interests: None.
(© 2021 The Authors.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: