Anesthesia Personnel's Experiences With Digital Anesthesia Information Management Systems: A Literature Review.

Autor: Leonardsen AL; nurse anesthetist, is an asssociate professor at Østfold University College and a researcher at Østfold Hospital Trust, Viken, Norway. Email: ann.c.leonardsen@hiof.no., Bruun AMG; nurse anesthetist, is program coordinator for the masters' program in anesthesia and critical care nursing at the University of South-Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway., Valeberg BT; nurse anesthetist, is a professor at Oslo Metropolitan University in Oslo, Norway, and at the University of South-Eastern Norway.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: AANA journal [AANA J] 2021 Dec; Vol. 89 (6), pp. 509-514.
Abstrakt: Traditionally, anesthetic records were in paper format. An increasing volume of complex data, legislation, and quality improvement initiatives related to clinical documentation have promoted the transition to digital records. Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) have been designed to directly extract patient information from the anesthesia workstation and transmit the data into documentation systems and databases. The purpose of this review was to explore existing literature on anesthesia personnel's experiences with digital AIMS. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, Embase, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. A total of 473 records were identified, of which 40 records were read in full-text. Seven records underwent quality appraisal, representing research from 1991 to 2018, all with a quantitative design. In total, 379 anesthesia personnel were included. Five studies were conducted in the United States; 1, in Korea; and 1, in Germany. Results were collated into the themes user satisfaction, technical aspects, physical placement of the system, paper-based vs electronic data entry, quality of care, and suggestions for improvement. Findings indicate both positive and negative effects of AIMS. Anesthesia personnel's experiences should be included in the planning, development, and implementation of digital data entry systems.
Competing Interests: Name: Ann-Chatrin L. Leonardsen, PhD, RN, NA Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. Disclosures: Partly supported by the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota. Name: Anne Marie Gran Bruun, MNSc, RN, NA Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. Disclosures: Partly supported by the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota. Name: Berit T. Valeberg, PhD, RN, NA Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. Disclosures: None. The authors did not discuss off-label use within the article. Disclosure statements are available for viewing upon request.
(Copyright © by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists.)
Databáze: MEDLINE