Patent hemostasis of radial artery: Comparison of two methods.

Autor:	Kyriakopoulos V; Department of Cardiology, Konstantopoulio General Hospital, Athens 14233, Greece., Xanthopoulos A; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece. andrewvxanth@gmail.com., Papamichalis M; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece., Skoularigkis S; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece., Tzavara C; Department of Health, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece., Papadakis E; Department of Cardiology, Konstantopoulio General Hospital, Athens 14233, Greece., Patsilinakos S; Department of Cardiology, Konstantopoulio General Hospital, Athens 14233, Greece., Triposkiadis F; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece., Skoularigis J; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	World journal of cardiology [World J Cardiol] 2021 Oct 26; Vol. 13 (10), pp. 574-584.
DOI:	10.4330/wjc.v13.i10.574
Abstrakt:	Background: Radial artery obstruction is the most common complication of coronary angiography performed via transradial access. Patent hemostasis can significantly reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion. Previous studies utilized sophisticated methods to evaluate radial artery patency. Simplified and easily applicable methods for successful patent hemostasis are currently lacking. Aim: To determine which method (pulse oximeter vs the traditional radial artery palpation) is better to achieve patent hemostasis. Methods: This prospective, single center study included 299 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention between November 2017 and July 2019. Patients less than 18 years old, with a history of radial artery disease, or no palpable artery pulse were excluded from the study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the first group, radial artery flow was assessed by palpation of the artery during hemostasis (traditional method). In the second group, radial artery patency was estimated with the use of a pulse oximeter. Two different compression devices were used for hemostasis (air chamber and pressure valve). The primary study endpoint was the achievement of successful patent hemostasis. Results: The two groups (pulse oximeter vs artery palpation) had no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, risk factors, or comorbidities except for supraventricular arrhythmias. The percentage of patients with successful patent hemostasis was significantly higher in the pulse oximeter group (82.2% vs 68.1%, P = 0.005). A lower percentage of patients with spasm was recorded in the pulse oximeter group (9.9% vs 19.0%, P = 0.024). The incidence of local complications, edema, bleeding, hematoma, vagotonia, or pain did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, the use of a pulse oximeter (OR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.34-4.13, P = 0.003) and advanced age (OR: 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.07, P = 0.006), were independently associated with an increased probability of successful patent hemostasis. The type of hemostatic device did not affect patent hemostasis ( P = 0.450). Conclusion: Patent hemostasis with the use of pulse oximeter is a simple, efficient, and safe method that is worthy of further investigation. Larger randomized studies are required to consider its clinical implications. Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests. (©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu