Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [ 18 F]DCFPyL PET/MRI compared to multiparametric MRI: a comparison with the histopathology in the radical prostatectomy specimen, the ProStaPET study.

Autor: Bodar YJL; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands. y.j.bodar@amsterdamumc.nl.; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands. y.j.bodar@amsterdamumc.nl.; Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. y.j.bodar@amsterdamumc.nl., Zwezerijnen BGJC; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., van der Voorn PJ; Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Jansen BHE; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Smit RS; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Kol SQ; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Meijer D; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., de Bie K; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Yaqub M; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Windhorst BAD; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Hendrikse HNH; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Vis AN; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; Prostate Cancer Network, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Oprea-Lager DE; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (VU University Medical Center), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging [Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging] 2022 Apr; Vol. 49 (5), pp. 1731-1742. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 02.
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05604-9
Abstrakt: Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a well-established imaging method for localizing primary prostate cancer (PCa) and for guiding targeted prostate biopsies. [ 18 F]DCFPyL positron emission tomography combined with MRI (PSMA-PET/MRI) might be of additional value to localize primary PCa. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI vs. mpMRI in tumour localization based on histopathology after robot-assisted radical-prostatectomy (RARP), also assessing biopsy advice for potential image-guided prostate biopsies.
Methods: Thirty prospectively included patients with intermediate to high-risk PCa underwent [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI prior to RARP. Two nuclear medicine physicians and two radiologists assessed tumour localization on [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and on mpMRI respectively, and gave a prostate biopsy advice (2 segments) using a 14-segment model of the prostate. The uro-pathologist evaluated the RARP specimen for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) using the same model. csPCa was defined as any PCa with Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2. The biopsy advice based on imaging was correlated with the final histology in the RARP specimen for a total-agreement analysis. An additional near-agreement correlation was performed to approximate clinical reality.
Results: Overall, 142 of 420 (33.8%) segments contained csPCa after pathologic examination. The segments recommended for targeted biopsy contained the highest GG PCa segment in 27/30 patients (90.0%) both for [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI. Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the total-agreement detection of csPCa per segment using [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI were 0.70, 50.0%, 89.9%, 71.7%, and 77.9%, respectively. These results were 0.75, 54.2%, 94.2%, 82.8%, and 80.1%, respectively, for mpMRI only.
Conclusion: Both [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI were only partly able to detect csPCa on a per-segment basis. An accurate detection (90.0%) of the highest GG lesion at patient-level was observed when comparing both [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI and mpMRI biopsy advice with the histopathology in the RARP specimen. So, despite the finding that [ 18 F]DCFPyL-PET/MRI adequately detects csPCa, it does not outperform mpMRI.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje