Extended Scalp Expansion for Larger Defects During Staged Cranioplasty.

Autor: Dinis J; Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine., Junn A; Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine., Kahle K; Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT., Alperovich M; Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The Journal of craniofacial surgery [J Craniofac Surg] 2022 May 01; Vol. 33 (3), pp. 787-789. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 29.
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008291
Abstrakt: Background: Secondary cranioplasty is often required following trauma, infection, radiation, or oncologic care, but is complicated by soft-tissue deficits with limited regional options. Scalp tissue expanders can provide hair-bearing, vascularized tissue for tension- free closure yielding optimal aesthetic results. However, the upper limit of safe scalp expansion has not been explored. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of extended scalp tissue expansion for challenging cranioplasties in a consecutive series.
Methods: Patients who underwent scalp tissue expansion before cranioplasty were retrospectively identified from a single institution between the years 2017 and 2020. Patient demographics, tissue expansion characteristics, and complications during expansion and after cranioplasty were collected.
Results: Six patients were identified who underwent staged scalp expansion for cranioplasty; 5 were male (83.3%) with a mean age of 43.8 ± 12.5 years. Indications for cranioplasty included 2 epilepsy- related procedures, 1 oligodendroglioma, 2 infectious processes, and 1 traumatic incident. A single expander was used in 5 cases, whereas 2 were used in the remaining case. The average expander fill volume was 434.3 ± 115 ccs with a mean expansion time of 3.3 ± 1.4  months. Expander infection occurred in 1 case and expander exposure in another, but adequate scalp expansion was still achieved in both. Successful closure over cranioplasty was obtained in 5 cases (83.3%); 1 patient ultimately required free flap reconstruction for soft-tissue coverage.
Conclusions: In cases of extended scalp defects, scalp tissue expansion remains the preferred method for recruiting large quantities of like tissue before implant cranioplasty.
Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2021 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)
Databáze: MEDLINE