Effects of Heat Acclimatization, Heat Acclimation, and Intermittent Exercise Heat Training on Time-Trial Performance.

Autor: Sekiguchi Y, Benjamin CL, Manning CN, Struder JF, Armstrong LE, Lee EC, Huggins RA, Stearns RL, Distefano LJ, Casa DJ
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Sports health [Sports Health] 2022 Sep-Oct; Vol. 14 (5), pp. 694-701. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 27.
DOI: 10.1177/19417381211050643
Abstrakt: Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of heat acclimatization (HAz) followed by heat acclimation (HA), and intermittent heat training (IHT) on time-trial performance.
Hypothesis: Time-trial performance will improve after HA and will further improve with twice a week of IHT.
Study Design: Interventional study.
Level of Evidence: Level 3.
Methods: A total of 26 male athletes (mean ± SD; age, 35 ± 12 years; body mass, 72.8 ± 8.9 kg; peak oxygen consumption [VO 2peak ], 57.3 ± 6.7 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ) completed five 4-km time trials (baseline, post-HAz, post-HA, post-IHT4, post-IHT8) in the heat (ambient temperature, 35.4°C ± 0.3°C; relative humidity, 46.7% ± 1.2%) on a motorized treadmill. After baseline time trial, participants performed HAz (109 ± 10 days) followed by post-HAz time trial. Then, participants completed 5 days of HA, which involved exercising to induce hyperthermia (38.50°C-39.75°C) for 60 minutes. Participants were then divided into 3 groups and completed IHT either twice per week (IHT MAX ), once per week (IHT MIN ), or not at all (IHT CON ) over an 8-week period. The exercise used for the IHT matched the HA. Four-kilometer time trials were performed after 4 weeks (post-IHT4) and 8 weeks of IHT (post-IHT8).
Results: Time trial was faster in post-HA (17.98 ± 2.51 minutes) compared with baseline (18.61 ± 3.06 minutes; P = 0.037) and post-HAz (18.66 ± 3.12 minutes; P = 0.023). Percentage change in time trial was faster in IHT MAX (-3.9% ± 5.2%) compared with IHT CON (11.5% ± 16.9%) ( P = 0.020) and approached statistical significance with large effect (effect size = 0.96) compared with IHT MIN (1.6% ± 6.2%; P = 0.059) at post-IHT8. Additionally, IHT MAX (-2.2% ± 4.2%) was faster than IHT CON (3.6% ± 6.9%) ( P = 0.05) at post-IHT4.
Conclusion: These results indicate that HA after HAz induces additional improvement in time-trial performance. IHT twice per week shows improvement after 8 weeks, while once per week maintains performance for 8 weeks. No IHT results in a loss of adaptations after 4 weeks and even greater losses after 8 weeks.
Clinical Relevance: HA after HAz improves time-trial performance, twice a week of IHT improves performance further, and once a week of IHT maintains performance for at least 8 weeks.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: