[Healthcare of Russia today. Epileptological service].

Autor: Karlov VA; Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia., Burd SG; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.; Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies, Moscow, Russia., Mironov MB; Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies, Moscow, Russia., Kukina NV; Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies, Moscow, Russia., Rubleva YV; Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies, Moscow, Russia.
Jazyk: ruština
Zdroj: Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova [Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova] 2021; Vol. 121 (9), pp. 85-89.
DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202112109185
Abstrakt: Objective: To examine the state of the epileptological service in Russia by conducting a survey of epileptologists working in different regions of the Russian Federation.
Material and Methods: To assess the structure and mechanisms of the antiepileptic service in the Russian Federation, the Russian League Against Epilepsy (RLAE) offered a questionnaire to 63 epileptologists, which has been answered by 37 epileptologists from 28 regions of the country.
Results and Conclusion: Among the respondents, 43% are focused on the care of outpatients, 35% work both in outpatient and inpatient appointments, 22% work only in hospitals. 24% of doctors are employees of neurological departments. 84% of epileptologists noted the neurological profile of their medical institution. The most common patient routing options were: «therapist-neurologist-epileptologist» (59%), «Neurologist-epileptologist» (81%), self-referral to an epileptologist (22%), «Psychiatrist-epileptologist» (16%). 59.5% of epileptologists work with adults and with children. 27% of respondents noted that they work with psychiatric patients. Interaction between the departments of neurology and practical health care is carried out in the form of consultations and training events, as noted by 68% of epileptologists. 73% of the epileptologist reported the willingness to actively interact with the RLAE. 54% of the respondents conduct socially oriented schools for patients and their relatives. In the context of the planned reorganization of the health care system, the epileptologists gave the outlook on the work of the epileptological service.
Conclusion: The main initiatives mentioned by the respondents were the following increasing the availability of medicines and examination methods, increase of continuity in the work of the epileptological service, creation of unified databases, creation of specialized epileptological centers and/or offices of epileptologists.
Databáze: MEDLINE