Variation in guideline-based prenatal care in a commercially insured population.

Autor: Gourevitch RA; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Delivery Decisions Initiative, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA. Electronic address: gourevitch@g.harvard.edu., Natwick T; OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, MN., Chaisson CE; OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, MN., Weiseth A; Delivery Decisions Initiative, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA., Shah NT; Delivery Decisions Initiative, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, Cambridge, MA; Maven Clinic, New York, NY.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology [Am J Obstet Gynecol] 2022 Mar; Vol. 226 (3), pp. 413.e1-413.e19. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 03.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.09.038
Abstrakt: Background: Despite the importance of prenatal care, quality measurement efforts have focused on the number of prenatal visits, or prenatal care adequacy, rather than the services received. It is unknown whether attending more prenatal visits is associated with receiving more guideline-based prenatal care services. The relationship between guideline-based prenatal care and patients' clinical and sociodemographic characteristics has also not been studied.
Objective: This study aimed to measure the receipt of guideline-based prenatal care among pregnant patients and to describe the association between guideline-based prenatal care and the number of prenatal visits and other patient characteristics.
Study Design: This was a retrospective descriptive cohort study of 176,092 pregnancy episodes between 2016 and 2019. We used de-identified administrative claims data on commercial enrollees across the United States from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. We identified the following 8 components of prenatal care that are universally recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other guideline-issuing organizations: testing for sexually transmitted infections, obstetric laboratory test panel, urine culture, urinalysis, anatomy scan ultrasound, oral glucose tolerance test, tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccine, and group B Streptococcus test. We measured the proportion of pregnant patients who received each of these guideline-based services at the appropriate gestational age. We measured the association between guideline-based services and the number of prenatal visits and prenatal care adequacy. We described variation of guideline-based care according to patient age, comorbidities, high deductible health plan enrollment, and their county's rurality, health professional shortage area status, racial composition, median income, and educational attainment.
Results: The 176,092 pregnancy episodes were mostly among patients aged 25 to 34 years (63%) with few pregnancy comorbidities (81%) and living in urban areas (92%). Guideline-based care varied by service, from 51% receiving a timely urinalysis to 90% receiving an anatomy scan and 91% completing testing for sexually transmitted infections. Patients with at least 4 prenatal visits received, on average, 6 of the 8 guideline-based services. Guideline-based care did not increase with additional prenatal visits and varied by patient characteristics. Rates of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis vaccination were lower in counties with high proportions of minoritized populations, lower education, and lower income.
Conclusion: In this commercially insured population, receipt of guideline-based care was not universal, did not increase with the number of prenatal visits, and varied by patient- and area-level characteristics. Measuring guideline-based care is feasible and may capture quality of prenatal care better than visit count or adequacy alone.
(Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: