Credibility Assessment of a Subject-Specific Mathematical Model of Blood Volume Kinetics for Prediction of Physiological Response to Hemorrhagic Shock and Fluid Resuscitation.

Autor:	Parvinian B; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States., Bighamian R; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States., Scully CG; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States., Hahn JO; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States., Pathmanathan P; Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Frontiers in physiology [Front Physiol] 2021 Sep 16; Vol. 12, pp. 705222. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 16 (Print Publication: 2021).
DOI:	10.3389/fphys.2021.705222
Abstrakt:	Subject-specific mathematical models for prediction of physiological parameters such as blood volume, cardiac output, and blood pressure in response to hemorrhage have been developed. In silico studies using these models may provide an effective tool to generate pre-clinical safety evidence for medical devices and help reduce the size and scope of animal studies that are performed prior to initiation of human trials. To achieve such a goal, the credibility of the mathematical model must be established for the purpose of pre-clinical in silico testing. In this work, the credibility of a subject-specific mathematical model of blood volume kinetics intended to predict blood volume response to hemorrhage and fluid resuscitation during fluid therapy was evaluated. A workflow was used in which: (i) the foundational properties of the mathematical model such as structural identifiability were evaluated; (ii) practical identifiability was evaluated both pre- and post-calibration, with the pre-calibration results used to determine an optimal splitting of experimental data into calibration and validation datasets; (iii) uncertainty in model parameters and the experimental uncertainty were quantified for each subject; and (iv) the uncertainty was propagated through the blood volume kinetics model and its predictive capability was evaluated via validation tests. The mathematical model was found to be structurally identifiable. Pre-calibration identifiability analysis led to splitting the 180 min of time series data per subject into 50 and 130 min calibration and validation windows, respectively. The average root mean squared error of the mathematical model was 12.6% using the calibration window of (0 min, 50 min). Practical identifiability was established post-calibration after fixing one of the parameters to a nominal value. In the validation tests, 82 and 75% of the subject-specific mathematical models were able to correctly predict blood volume response when predictive capability was evaluated at 180 min and at the time when amount of infused fluid equals fluid loss. Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2021 Parvinian, Bighamian, Scully, Hahn and Pathmanathan.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu