| Autor: |
Zvidzayi M; Biopharmaceutics Research Institute, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa., Rath S; Biopharmaceutics Research Institute, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa., Bon C; Biostudy Solutions LLC, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA., Abboo S; Faculty of Pharmacy, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa., Kanfer I; Biopharmaceutics Research Institute, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa.; Leslie Dan College of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, Canada. |
| Abstrakt: |
The potencies of topical corticosteroid products have mainly been classified using clinical data but in some instances, the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) vasoconstrictor assay (VCA) to assess the skin blanching response has also been used. However, the reported skin blanching response data were often based on a single visual reading and lack information on the dose (amount/quantity) or dose duration. Although several lists classifying potencies of various topical corticosteroid products have been published, the inherent potencies of topical corticosteroid raw materials used as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) have not been investigated. The objective was to rank the inherent potencies of topical corticosteroid APIs and to standardize dosing such that the relevant compounds could be compared on a normalized molar basis. The potencies of clobetasol propionate, halcinonide, mometasone furoate, and fluocinolone acetonide were compared using the resulting E max data following the fitting of the relevant response data to the E max model where mometasone furoate > fluocinolone acetonide = clobetasol propionate > halcinonide. This ranking lists the respective inherent potencies of the APIs, which will facilitate the choice of a suitable candidate for incorporation into an appropriate topical corticosteroid product for a specific clinical indication. |
