Hand-Arm Vibration Controls for Jackleg Rock Drills: A Pilot Study Assessing Ergonomic Hazards.

Autor: Kremer C; Department of Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene, Montana Technological University, Butte, Montana 59701., Autenrieth D; Department of Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene, Montana Technological University, Butte, Montana 59701., Stack T; Department of Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene, Montana Technological University, Butte, Montana 59701., Rosenthal S; Department of Mining Engineering, Montana Technological University, Butte, Montana 59701., Gilkey D; Department of Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene, Montana Technological University, Butte, Montana 59701.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Mining, metallurgy & exploration [Min Metall Explor] 2021; Vol. 38 (5), pp. 1933-1941.
DOI: 10.1007/s42461-021-00451-6
Abstrakt: Jackleg drill operators are exposed to harmful levels of hand-arm vibration (HAV). Anti-vibration handles and gloves provide modest reductions in HAV exposures and forearm muscle exertion from the use of AV handles and gloves by jackleg drill operators. The goal of this pilot study was to investigate changes in HAV with the use of anti-vibration gloves and handles compared to forearm muscle exertion experienced by operators and measured with surface electromyography (EMG). Five subjects operated the drill under four different cases: no anti-vibration controls, anti-vibration gloves only, anti-vibration handle only, and simultaneous anti-vibration handle and glove use. Muscle exertion was expressed as a percent of maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) and was compared using Welch's ANOVA with Games-Howell post-hoc comparisons. The case with both anti-vibration controls in use simultaneously (largest grip diameter) was associated with a mean %MVC of 36.13% during operation for all forearm muscles combined, which was significantly higher than the other cases (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in mean HAV exposures. The anti-vibration handle with anti-vibration glove case only increased the maximum allowable exposure time by eight minutes as compared to the control case without any anti-vibration controls. These results suggest that the modest HAV exposure reductions from the use of anti-vibration handles and gloves may pale in comparison to the increased muscle exertion resulting from their use, and this tradeoff among jackleg drill operators is a potential concern that warrants further investigation.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: