Geriatric nutritional risk index is a predictor of recurrent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Autor: Kaplan M; Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Gaziantep, Turkey., Vuruskan E; Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Gaziantep, Turkey., Altunbas G; Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Gaziantep, Turkey., Yavuz F; Adıyaman University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Adıyaman, Turkey., Ilgın Kaplan G; Ersin Arslan Training& Research Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine Gaziantep, Turkey., Duzen IV; Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Gaziantep, Turkey., Savcılıoglu MD; Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Gaziantep, Turkey., Annac S; Hasan Kalyoncu University, Faculty of Health Sciences Gaziantep, Turkey., Bursa N; Hacettepe University, Department of Statistics Ankara, Turkey., Sucu MM; Gaziantep University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology Gaziantep, Turkey.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Kardiologiia [Kardiologiia] 2021 Aug 31; Vol. 61 (8), pp. 60-67. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 31.
DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2021.8.n1669
Abstrakt: Aim To investigate the relationship between malnutrition and follow-up cardiovascular (CV) events in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).Material and methods A retrospective study was performed on 298 patients with NSTEMI. The baseline geriatric nutritionalrisk index (GNRI) was calculated at the first visit. The patients were divided into three groups accordingto the GNRI: >98, no-risk; 92 to ≤98, low risk; 82 to <92, moderate to high (MTH) risk. The studyendpoint was a composite of follow-up CV events, including all-cause mortality, non-valvular atrialfibrillation (NVAF), hospitalizations, and need for repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Results Follow-up data showed that MTH risk group had significantly higher incidence of repeat PCI and all-cause mortality compared to other groups (p<0.001). However, follow-up hospitalizations and NVAFwere similar between groups (p>0.05). The mean GNRI was 84.6 in patients needing repeat PCI and99.8 in patients who did not require repeat PCI (p<0.001). Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed thatpatients with MTH risk had significantly poorer survival (p<0.001). According to multivariate Coxregression analysis, theMTH risk group (hazard ratio=5.372) was associated with increased mortality.Conclusion GNRI value may have a potential role for the prediction of repeat PCI in patients with NSTEMI.
Databáze: MEDLINE