Cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant patients: Prevalence, risk factors, and impact on outcome - A local multicentre experience.

Autor: Abou-Jaoudé M; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon; Department of Surgery, Sacre Coeur Hospital, Hazmieh, Lebanon; Department of Surgery, Middle East Institute of Health, Bsalim, Lebanon. Electronic address: marounaboujaoude@hotmail.com., El Hage S; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon; Institut National de Santé Publique, Epidémiologie Clinique et Toxicologie, Sector of Public Health and Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon., Akiki D; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon., Fadlallah M; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon., Ghaith AK; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon., Dib A; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Transplant immunology [Transpl Immunol] 2021 Dec; Vol. 69, pp. 101473. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 20.
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101473
Abstrakt: Background: CMV infection prevalence in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is reported to be high in the literature, reaching rates of over 80%.
Objectives: The primary endpoints were the evaluation of the prevalence, the risks factors, and the effects of CMV infection on graft function and survival, as well as patient survival at three years after kidney transplantation.
Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 288 kidney transplant patients operated in three Lebanese transplant centers between 1998 and 2017 with three years of follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: those free of any CMV infection (271 patients (94%); Group I) and those who suffered from CMV infection (17 patients (6%); Group II).
Results: Baseline demographics of the two groups were similar, including recipient and donor gender and age, cause of renal disease, recipient body mass index, pre-transplant fasting blood sugar and dialysis duration, HLA matching between donor and recipient, degree of sensitization in the recipient, type of CMV prophylaxis, maintenance immunosuppression and immunological characteristics. The prevalence of CMV infection is 5.9% among KTR. There were significant differences between the two groups concerning the type of induction therapy and the duration of anti-CMV prophylaxis. The rate of infected patients and infectious episodes were significantly higher in Group II. At 3-years, graft function and survival, patient survival, and the rate of new-onset diabetes were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: The present study is the first to explore the incidence and risk factors of CMV in kidney transplant patients in Lebanon. Comprehensive nationwide studies are therefore necessary to determine the epidemiology and risk factors of CMV infection after kidney transplantation in Lebanon.
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: