Research Staff Perspectives on Cancer Clinical Trials and Barriers to Recruitment: A Qualitative Research.

Autor:	Keruakous AR; Hematology and Medical Oncology, Augusta University Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, USA.; Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA., Day S; Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA., Garcia-Ramiu K; Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA., Yarbrough M; Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA., Asch AS; Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Cureus [Cureus] 2021 Aug 15; Vol. 13 (8), pp. e17202. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 15 (Print Publication: 2021).
DOI:	10.7759/cureus.17202
Abstrakt:	Background Clinical trials are key elements of the processes that account for many of the recent advances in cancer care. Unfortunately, they are becoming more challenging to conduct. Furthermore, a large number of clinical trials in oncology close early due to poor accrual. To identify opportunities for continued improvement in clinical trial enrollment, we sought to identify the obstacles encountered by our clinical trial research staff in these activities. Methods This is a prospective qualitative study, using Grounded Theory Methodology that was concluded at Stephenson Cancer Center (SCC). SCC has been the lead accruer to National Cancer Institute-Lead Academic Participating Sites (NCI-LAPS) trials over the past three years, and in addition, fields investigator-initiated and industry-sponsored trials. We conducted a survey of our research staff including all research nurses and disease site coordinators who participate in recruitment, screening, consenting, data collection, and compliance for interventional clinical trials. We then performed a follow-up meeting with our research coordinators to clarify responses. The study objectives were to highlight common barriers to recruiting adult cancer patients, encountered by research coordinators from all disease sites and to propose effective solutions to identified barriers. Results We are reporting our results of investigating barriers to clinical trials enrollment from a new perspective. The most commonly reported obstacles for clinical trials enrollment from our research staff's perspective were categorized into five themes: clinical trials protocol, communication barriers and cultural beliefs, financial barriers, patients' comorbidities and performance status, and physicians' commitment. Conclusions Although assessing barriers encountered by clinical research staff is an infrequently used metric for improving clinical trial enrollment, it provides an important perspective in the field. Implementing interventions to improve clinical trial feasibility and accrual is critical to improving cancer care. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2021, Keruakous et al.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu