Australian experience with robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with comparison to a conventional laparoscopic series.

Autor: Soon DSC; Department of General Surgery, Epworth Richmond, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia. davidsoon1991@gmail.com.; Department of General Surgical Specialties, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia. davidsoon1991@gmail.com., Moar X; Department of General Surgery, Epworth Richmond, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia.; Department of General Surgery, St Vincent's Private Hospital, 22-36 Scott St, Toowomba, QLD, 4350, Australia., Lee DJ; Department of General Surgery, Epworth Richmond, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia.; Department of General Surgical Specialties, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia., Moore P; Department of General Surgery, Epworth Richmond, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia., Clough A; Department of General Surgery, Epworth Richmond, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC, 3121, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Surgical endoscopy [Surg Endosc] 2022 Jun; Vol. 36 (6), pp. 4025-4031. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 15.
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08723-4
Abstrakt: Background: Robotic surgery is a novel approach to abdominal surgery. In Australia, the uptake of robotic assistance for bariatric surgery has been relatively slow compared to many other countries. The aim of this study is to report the first high volume experience of robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in Australia (RRYGB) and compare outcomes with a similar laparoscopic group (LRYGB).
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 100 RRYGB versus 100 LRYGB was carried out over a period of seven years performed by two surgeons. These groups were matched by revisional status. Outcomes recorded included operative times, conversion rate, hospital stay, short-term (30 days) complication rates, and long-term complication rates. Baseline comorbidities of patients were also recorded.
Results: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for comorbidity rates (higher in LRYGB group). The mean age was 43 (RRYGB) and 44(LRYGB) years, respectively. The mean pre-op BMI was 44.3 in the RRYGB group and 44.7 in the LRYGB group. Mean operating time in the RRYGB group was 208 min compared to 175 min in the LRYGB group. The number of patients with major complications was 1 in the robotic group versus 5 in the laparoscopic group (P: 0.2166). Minor complications were higher in the robotic group (17 vs. 5, P: 0.0054). Median length of stay of patients with RRYGB was 4 days compared to 5 days for the LRYGB group.
Conclusion: RRYGB has been successfully implemented in Australia with low complication rates compared to conventional laparoscopic RYGB. Operating times are longer compared to LRYGB which is consistent with most published literature. To justify increased costs generally associated with robotic surgery, better quality studies are needed to accurately assess potential cost savings with length of stay and safety benefits to patients and institutions.
(© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: