Trends and characteristics of neurotization during breast reconstruction: perioperative outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Autor: Laikhter E; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Shiah E; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Manstein SM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Comer CD; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Bustos VP; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA., Lin SJ; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery [J Plast Surg Hand Surg] 2022 Oct; Vol. 56 (5), pp. 291-297. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 15.
DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.1973484
Abstrakt: This study aimed to investigate the impact of performing neurotization during breast reconstruction on total operating time and post-operative morbidity. The 2015 through 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases were utilized to identify patients who underwent breast reconstruction with and without neurotization. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics and outcomes were examined for each group. Thirty-day complication and readmission rates were compared using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. Of 73,507 patients identified who underwent breast reconstruction, 240 had reconstruction with neurotization. Autologous reconstruction was more prevalent for patients with neurotization (90.8% vs. 18.5%, p <.001). Average operating time was longer when neurotization was performed during both autologous (527.1 ± 152.4 vs. 414.8 ± 186.3, p <.001) and alloplastic-only reconstruction (310.9 ± 115.9 vs. 173.0 ± 94.3, p <.001). The likelihood total operating time exceeded 521 min (two standard deviations above average) increased when neurotization was performed (OR 2.464, CI 1.864-3.255, p <.001). Thirty-day complications occurred in 13.8% of patients with neurotization and 6.8% without ( p <.001). Similarly, 30-day readmission rates were higher for patients with neurotization (7.5% vs. 4.2%, p <.001). However, when adjusted for comorbidities and operative characteristics, neurotization did not significantly impact 30-day complication rates (OR 0.802, CI 0.548-1.174, p =.256) or 30-day readmission rates (OR 1.352, CI 0.822-2.223, p =.077). Although neurotization during breast reconstruction increases operating time, comorbidities and procedural characteristics play a greater role in post-operative outcomes than neurotization alone.
Databáze: MEDLINE