Timing of tracheostomy in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor:	Foran SJ; From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine (S.J.F., J.S., V.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care (S.T., J.S., V.M.), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine (J.S., V.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry (D.J.K.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine (V.M.), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; and Krembil Research Institute (V.M.), University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada., Taran S, Singh JM, Kutsogiannis DJ, McCredie V
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The journal of trauma and acute care surgery [J Trauma Acute Care Surg] 2022 Jan 01; Vol. 92 (1), pp. 223-231.
DOI:	10.1097/TA.0000000000003394
Abstrakt:	Background: Patients with acute traumatic cervical or high thoracic level spinal cord injury (SCI) typically require mechanical ventilation (MV) during their acute admission. Placement of a tracheostomy is preferred when prolonged weaning from MV is anticipated. However, the optimal timing of tracheostomy placement in patients with acute traumatic SCI remains uncertain. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine the effects of early versus late tracheostomy or prolonged intubation in patients with acute traumatic SCI on important clinical outcomes. Methods: Six databases were searched from their inception to January 2020. Conference abstracts from relevant proceedings and the gray literature were searched to identify additional studies. Data were obtained by two independent reviewers to ensure accuracy and completeness. The quality of observational studies was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Results: Seventeen studies (2,804 patients) met selection criteria, 14 of which were published after 2009. Meta-analysis showed that early tracheostomy was not associated with decreased short-term mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-1.79; p = 0.65; n = 2,072), but was associated with a reduction in MV duration (mean difference [MD], 13.1 days; 95% CI, -6.70 to -21.11; p = 0.0002; n = 855), intensive care unit length of stay (MD, -10.20 days; 95% CI, -4.66 to -15.74; p = 0.0003; n = 855), and hospital length of stay (MD, -7.39 days; 95% CI, -3.74 to -11.03; p < 0.0001; n = 423). Early tracheostomy was also associated with a decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheostomy-related complications (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; p = 0.02; n = 2,043 and RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.84; p = 0.001; n = 812 respectively). The majority of studies ranked as good methodologic quality on the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Conclusion: Early tracheostomy in patients with acute traumatic SCI may reduce duration of mechanical entilation, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay. Current studies highlight the lack of high-level evidence to guide the optimal timing of tracheostomy in acute traumatic SCI. Future research should seek to understand whether early tracheostomy improves patient comfort, decreases duration of sedation, and improves long-term outcomes. Level of Evidence: Systematic Review, level III. (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu