Validity and Reliability of the Urdu Version of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder.

Autor:	Munawar K; Department of Psychology, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences (JCSMHS), Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia., Aqeel M; Department of Psychology, Foundation University, Islamabad, Pakistan., Rehna T; Department of Applied Psychology, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan., Shuja KH; Department of Psychology, Capital University of Science & Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan., Bakrin FS; School of Pharmacy, Kumpulan Perubatan Johor (KPJ) Healthcare University College, Nilai, Malaysia., Choudhry FR; Department of Psychology, Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, Selayang, Malaysia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Frontiers in psychology [Front Psychol] 2021 Aug 20; Vol. 12, pp. 533526. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 20 (Print Publication: 2021).
DOI:	10.3389/fpsyg.2021.533526
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Although the translation and the validation of the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (MSI-BPD) are performed in various languages and samples, no study has established the validity and reliability of the Urdu version of MSI-BPD in individuals with cardiac problems. Materials and Methods: The Urdu version of the MSI-BPD was prepared through the standard back-translation method. The translation and adaption were completed in four steps: forward translation, adaption and translation, back translation and committee approach, and cross-language validation. The sample, selected through the purposive sampling method, comprised of 150 adults with cardiac problems (men = 75 and women = 75), with an age range of 23-78 years ( M = 55, SD = 10.6). The Cronbach alpha reliability and factorial validity of the MSI-BPD were assessed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Pearson correlation analyses. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability (at 2 weeks' interval) were used to evaluate the reliability. Statistical analyses were performed, using SPSS (version 22) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) software. Results: Preliminary analysis revealed that the overall instrument had good internal consistency (Urdu MSI-BPD α = 0.79; English MSI-BPD α = 0.77) as well as test-retest correlation coefficients for 15 days ( r = 0.94). Conclusions: Findings suggested that the MSI-BPD, with important limitations, can be used as an effective preliminary screening tool to measure BPD in Urdu-speaking adults with cardiac problems. Further validations should be conducted to make the translated version of the MSI-BPD an appropriate tool to screen BPD in hospitals and mental health care settings. Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2021 Munawar, Aqeel, Rehna, Shuja, Bakrin and Choudhry.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu