[Reflux nephropathy and scarring nephropathy: So close and yet so different].
Autor: | García Nieto VM; Sección de Nefrología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España. Electronic address: vgarcianieto@gmail.com., Monge Zamorano M; Servicio Canario de Salud, Centro de Salud de Tacoronte, Tacoronte, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España., Antón Hernández L; Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España., Luis Yanes MI; Sección de Nefrología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España., Tejera Carreño P; Sección de Nefrología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España., Moraleda Mesa T; Sección de Nefrología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | Spanish; Castilian |
Zdroj: | Anales de pediatria [An Pediatr (Engl Ed)] 2021 Sep 03. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 03. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.anpedi.2021.08.001 |
Abstrakt: | Objectives: Reflux nephropathy is a radiologic condition commonly used to express the existence of renal morphological lesions in patients who have or had vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This morphological concept is used based on the image data collected, without conducting basic complementary renal function studies. The present study was designed to demonstrate that patients with active VUR present different functional renal alterations from those shown by patients with disappeared VUR. Patients and Methods: Longitudinal descriptive retrospective analysis including 89 children (46M, 43F) with VUR diagnosis through a standard voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). The basic renal function tests collected were the maximum urinary osmolality (UOsm) and the urinary albumin/creatinine and NAG/creatinine ratios. The data collected corresponded to two moments, when VUR was diagnosed and when it had already disappeared. Results: Quantitative differences were verified in the three functional parameters when comparing those corresponding to both moments of the study. In the qualitative analysis, in relation to the intensity of the VUR, differences were observed in UOsm at diagnosis and in the albumin/creatinine ratio once the VUR had cured. At this last moment, a significant increase in the albumin/creatinine ratio was observed in patients with loss of renal parenchyma in relation to those without residual morphological lesions. Conclusions: Concentrating ability defect is the most frequent finding in children with active reflux (true reflux nephropathy), whereas the most frequent functional disturbance found, once VUR has cured, is an increase in urinary albumin excretion, related to parenchymal damage. The term dysplastic-scarring nephropathy, could be more appropriate for patients with residual morphological lesions and impaired renal function, once VUR is cured. (Copyright © 2021 Asociación Española de Pediatría. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |