Endangering the integrity of science by misusing unvalidated models and untested assumptions as facts: General considerations and the mineral and phosphorus scarcity fallacy.

Autor: Scholz RW; Department of Knowledge and Information Management, Danube University Krems, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Strasse 39, 3500 Krems, Austria.; Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitaetsstrasse 22, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.; Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Berliner Strasse, 130, 14467 Potsdam, Germany., Wellmer FW; Neue Sachlichkeit 32, 30655 Hannover, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Sustainability science [Sustain Sci] 2021; Vol. 16 (6), pp. 2069-2086. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 26.
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w
Abstrakt: There is increasing demand for science to contribute to solving societal problems (solutionism). Thereby, scientists may become normative activists for solving certain problems (advocacy). When doing this, they may insufficiently differentiate between scientific and political modes of reasoning and validation (de-differentiationism), which is sometimes linked to questionable forms of utilizing the force of facts (German: Faktengewalt ). Scientific findings are simplified and communicated in such a way that they acquire a status as unfalsifiable and absolutely true (truth to power). This becomes critical if the consistency and validation of the findings are questionable and scientific models underlying science activists' actions are doubtful, oversimplified, or incorrect. Herein, we exemplarily elaborate how the integrity of science is endangered by normative solutionist and sociopolitically driven transition management and present mineral scarcity claims that ignore that reserves or resources are dynamic geotechnological-socioeconomic entities. We present the main mineral scarcity models and their fallacious assumptions. We then discuss the phosphorus scarcity fallacy, which is of particular interest as phosphorus is non-substitutable and half of all current food production depends on fertilizers (and thus phosphorus). We show that phosphorus scarcity claims are based on integrating basic geoeconomic knowledge and discuss cognitive and epistemological barriers and motivational and sociopolitical drivers promoting the scarcity fallacy, which affects high-level public media. This may induce unsustainable environmental action. Scientists as honest knowledge brokers should communicate the strengths but also the constraints and limits of scientific modeling and of applying it in reality.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11625-021-01006-w.
(© The Author(s) 2021.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: