| Autor: |
Atencio-Osorio MA; Grupo de Investigación en Deporte de Rendimiento (GRINDER), Programa de Educación Física y Deporte, Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali 76001, Colombia., Carrillo-Arango HA; Grupo de Investigación en Deporte de Rendimiento (GRINDER), Programa de Educación Física y Deporte, Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali 76001, Colombia.; Grupo de Investigación en Actividad Física y Salud (GIAFS), Institución Universitaria Escuela Nacional del Deporte, Santiago de Cali 76001, Colombia., Correa-Rodríguez M; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Granada (IBIS Granada), Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada (UGR), 18001 Granada, Spain., Rivera D; Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, 31000 Navarra, Spain., Castro-Piñero J; GALENO Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain.; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica de Cádiz (INiBICA), 11001 Cádiz, Spain., Ramírez-Vélez R; Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, Navarrabiomed, CIBER of Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Pamplona, 31000 Navarra, Spain. |
| Abstrakt: |
Sedentary behavior (SB) is influenced by variations in social, cultural and economic contexts. This study assesses the test-retest reliability and validity of the Youth Leisure-time Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (YLSBQ), a self-report tool that examines total and domain-specific SB in a cohort of young adults from Colombia. A cross-sectional validation study was conducted among 447 Colombian college students (52.8% men; mean (± standard deviation) age of 19.55 ± 2.54 years). To assess the reliability of the YLSBQ, Kappa statistics (k) were used. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to determine validity. The Cronbach alpha for the 12 behaviors of the YLSBQ showed a good-to-excellent internal consistency (0.867, ranging from 0.715-0.935). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated that 10 items (83.0%) and two items (17.0%) showed excellent and good reliability, respectively. Furthermore, ICC between the total sedentary time was 0.926 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.912 - 0.939), which was interpreted as excellent. The goodness-of-fit tests provided evidence that overall, a four-factor solution was an adequate fit with the time scores. In conclusion, the YLSBQ could be considered a reliable, valid and usable tool for the assessment of SB in young adults in a Latin American country. We found that the psychometric properties of the questionnaire were similar to those of the original Spanish validation study. |
