Association between low fetal fraction in cell-free DNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome: A systematic review.
Autor: | Scheffer PG; Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Wirjosoekarto SAM; Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Becking EC; Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Weiss MM; Department of Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., Bax CJ; Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Oepkes D; Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands., Sistermans EA; Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Henneman L; Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Bekker MN; Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Prenatal diagnosis [Prenat Diagn] 2021 Sep; Vol. 41 (10), pp. 1287-1295. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 18. |
DOI: | 10.1002/pd.6028 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: Low fetal fraction (LFF) in prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is an important cause of test failure and no-call results. LFF might reflect early abnormal placentation and therefore be associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Here, we review the available literature on the relationship between LFF in cfDNA testing and adverse pregnancy outcome. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE up to November 1, 2020. Results: Five studies met the criteria for inclusion; all were retrospective observational cohort studies. The cohort sizes ranged from 370 to 6375 pregnancies, with all tests performed in the first trimester or early second trimester. A 4% cutoff for LFF was used in two studies, two studies used the 5th and 25th percentiles, respectively, and one study used a variety of cutoff values for LFF. LFF in prenatal cfDNA testing was observed to be associated with hypertensive disease of pregnancy, small for gestational age neonates, and preterm birth. Conflicting results were found regarding the association between LFF and gestational diabetes mellitus. Conclusions: LFF in cfDNA testing is associated with adverse pregnancy outcome,specifically pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and impaired fetal growth related to placental dysfunction. Since the available evidence is limited, a large prospective cohort study on the relationship between fetal fraction and pregnancy outcomes is needed. (© 2021 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |