| Autor: |
Loeffler-Henry K; Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6., Kang C; Department of Biosciences, Mokpo National University, Muan, Jeollanamdo 58554, South Korea., Sherratt TN; Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6. |
| Jazyk: |
angličtina |
| Zdroj: |
Proceedings. Biological sciences [Proc Biol Sci] 2021 Jul 28; Vol. 288 (1955), pp. 20210866. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 28. |
| DOI: |
10.1098/rspb.2021.0866 |
| Abstrakt: |
Flash behaviour is widespread in the animal kingdom and describes the exposure of a hidden conspicuous signal as an animal flees from predators. Recent studies have demonstrated that the signal can enhance survivorship by leading pursuing predators into assuming the flasher is also conspicuous at rest. Naturally, this illusion will work best if potential predators are ignorant of the flasher's resting appearance, which could be achieved if the prey flees while the predator is relatively far away. To test this hypothesis, we compared the survival of flashing and non-flashing computer-generated prey with different flight initiation distances (FIDs) using humans as model predators. This experiment found that flash displays confer a survivorship advantage only to those prey with a long FID. A complementary phylogenetic analysis of Australian bird species supports these results: after controlling for body size, species with putative flashing signals had longer FIDs than those without. Species with putative flashing signals also tended to be larger, as demonstrated in other taxa. The anti-predation benefit of flash displays is therefore related to the nature of escape behaviour. Since birds with hidden signals tend to flee at a distance, the flash display here is unlikely to function by startling would-be predators. |
| Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
