| Autor: |
Harel R; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Life Sciences institute, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel 9190401.; Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.; Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA., Loftus JC; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Life Sciences institute, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel 9190401.; Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.; Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA., Crofoot MC; Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Life Sciences institute, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel 9190401.; Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.; Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.; Center for the Advanced Study of Collective Behavior, University of Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany. |
| Abstrakt: |
When members of a group differ in locomotor capacity, coordinating collective movement poses a challenge: some individuals may have to move faster (or slower) than their preferred speed to remain together. Such compromises have energetic repercussions, yet research in collective behaviour has largely neglected locomotor consensus costs. Here, we integrate high-resolution tracking of wild baboon locomotion and movement with simulations to demonstrate that size-based variation in locomotor capacity poses an obstacle to the collective movement. While all baboons modulate their gait and move-pause dynamics during collective movement, the costs of maintaining cohesion are disproportionately borne by smaller group members. Although consensus costs are not distributed equally, all group-mates do make locomotor compromises, suggesting a shared decision-making process drives the pace of collective movement in this highly despotic species. These results highlight the importance of considering how social dynamics and locomotor capacity interact to shape the movement ecology of group-living species. |
