Effect of locally delivered adjunctive antibiotics during surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Autor: | Yusri S; Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt., Elfana A; Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt., Elbattawy W; Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt., Fawzy El-Sayed KM; Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Al Saraya Str. 11, Manial, Cairo, Egypt. karim.fawzy@gmail.com.; Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany. karim.fawzy@gmail.com. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2021 Sep; Vol. 25 (9), pp. 5127-5138. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 20. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-021-04056-7 |
Abstrakt: | Aim: The present study aimed to systematically assess current evidence on effects of locally delivered antibiotics during periodontal surgery compared to periodontal surgery alone on clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, recession depth (RD) changes, gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI). Methodology: MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched up to April 2021 for randomized clinical trials (RCT), evaluating effects of locally delivered antibiotics during periodontal surgery. CAL gain served as primary, while PPD reduction, RD changes, GI and PI as secondary outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess possible bias. Data were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed where appropriate. Result: Screening of 2314 papers resulted in nine eligible studies. No adverse events were reported. Data on outcome variables were pooled and analyzed using generic inverse variance model and presented as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Statistically significant improvements in favor of antibiotics' delivery were observed in studies with follow-up of ≤6 months for CAL gain (WMD = 0.61 mm (95% CI [0.07, 1.14]; p = 0.03), PPD reduction (WMD = 0.41 mm (95% CI [0.02, 0.80]; p = 0.04)) and BOP (WMD = -28.47% (95% CI [-33.00, -23.94]); p < 0.001), while for GI improvements were notable for >6 to 12 months (WMD = -0.27 (95% CI [-0.49, -0.06]; p = 0.01)). Conclusion: Within the current review's limitations, locally delivered antibiotics during surgical periodontal therapy results in post-surgical improvements for CAL, PPD, and BOP (≤6 months) with a longer-lasting GI improvement. Further randomized controlled trials are needed with true periodontal end-points to assess the ideal antibiotic agent, dosage, and delivery methods. Clinical Relevance: Local delivery of antibiotics during periodontal surgery improved clinical parameters for up to 6-month follow-up, with beneficial longer effects on gingival inflammation. Within the current study's limitation, the presented evidence could support the elective usage of locally delivered antibiotics during surgical periodontal therapy. (© 2021. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |