[Influence of deep implantation on conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation].

Autor: Saad M; Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland., Klaus Y; Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland., Buhse P; Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland., Puehler T; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Deutschland.; Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland., Lutter G; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Deutschland.; Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland., Seoudy H; Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Deutschland., Frank D; Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland. derk.frank@uksh.de.; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Kiel, Deutschland. derk.frank@uksh.de.
Jazyk: němčina
Zdroj: Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie [Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol] 2021 Sep; Vol. 32 (3), pp. 371-379. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 14.
DOI: 10.1007/s00399-021-00784-1
Abstrakt: Background: Conduction disturbances are common complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). One influencing factor is implantation depth (ID) of the TAVI prosthesis. Since this should be standardized, a differentiated consideration of ID is necessary.
Objective: Examination of the impact of ID at different anatomical regions of the left ventricular outflow tract on new conduction disturbances, new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and survival.
Materials and Methods: The retrospective cohort study included 420 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI with new-generation devices, including 352 patients without pre-existing pacemakers, for analyses on new pacemaker implantation. Of them, 46 patients underwent PPI. ID at non- (NCC) and left-coronary cusp (LCC) were measured using fluoroscopy after valve implantation. Deep ID was defined as the 4th quartile of each prosthesis' ID. Survival was determined from the two-year follow-up.
Results and Conclusions: Deep ID was associated with higher PPI rate only at NCC (p = 0.013). At LCC deep ID resulted in more frequent permanent left bundle branch block (p = 0.014). DI, preexisting pacemaker or new PPI did not affect 2‑year survival. No patients with new PPI suffered moderate to severe paravalvular leak. ID at NCC could be a predictor for PPI after TAVI. A detailed consideration of ID in intervention planning might predict outcome after TAVI and common complications. PPI after TAVI and deep ID at NCC and LCC can be considered safe regarding survival in absence of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: