Feasibility of motor imagery and effects of activating and relaxing practice on autonomic functions in healthy young adults: A randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded, pilot trial.

Autor: Kahraman T; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, Turkey., Kaya DO; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, Turkey., Isik T; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, Turkey., Gultekin SC; Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, Turkey., Seebacher B; Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.; Department of Rehabilitation Research, Rehab Centre Muenster, Muenster, Austria.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2021 Jul 13; Vol. 16 (7), pp. e0254666. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 13 (Print Publication: 2021).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254666
Abstrakt: Introduction: Motor imagery (MI) is the mental rehearsal of a motor task. Between real and imagined movements, a functional equivalence has been described regarding timing and brain activation. The primary study aim was to investigate the feasibility of MI training focusing on the autonomic function in healthy young people. Further aims were to evaluate participants' MI abilities and compare preliminary effects of activating and relaxing MI on autonomic function and against controls.
Methods: A single-blinded randomised controlled pilot trial was performed. Participants were randomised to the activating MI (1), relaxing MI (2), or control (3) group. Following a MI familiarisation, they practiced home-based kinaesthetic MI for 17 minutes, 5 times/week for 2 weeks. Participants were called once for support. The primary outcome was the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial using predefined criteria. Secondary outcomes were participants' MI ability using the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised, mental chronometry tests, hand laterality judgement and semi-structured interviews, autonomic function.
Results: A total of 35 participants completed the study. The feasibility of a larger study was confirmed, despite 35% attrition related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Excellent MI capabilities were seen in participants, and significant correlations between MI ability measures. Interview results showed that participants accepted or liked both interventions. Seven major themes and insider recommendations for MI interventions emerged. No significant differences and negligible to medium effects were observed in MI ability or autonomic function between baseline and post-intervention measures or between groups.
Conclusions: Results showed that neither activating nor relaxing MI seems to change autonomic function in healthy individuals. Further adequately powered studies are required to answer open questions remaining from this study. Future studies should investigate effects of different MI types over a longer period, to rule out habituation and assess autonomic function at several time points and simultaneously with MI.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: