The role of primary care pharmacists in the response to the Zika epidemic.
Autor: | Santos-Pinto CB; ScD, MSc. Adjunct Professor. Integrated Health Institute (INISA), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul . Campo Grande ( Brazil ). bocage.santos@ufms.br., Osorio-De-Castro CS; ScD, MSc, Senior Researcher. Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health (ENSP), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ) . Rio de Janeiro ( Brazil ). claudiaosorio.soc@gmail.com., Ferreira LM; Faculty of Pharmacy, Fluminense Federal University . Niterói ( Brazil ). lamachado@id.uff.br., Miranda ES; ScD, MSc, Adjunct Professor. Faculty of Pharmacy, Fluminense Federal University . Niterói ( Brazil ). elainemiranda@id.uff.br. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Pharmacy practice [Pharm Pract (Granada)] 2021 Apr-Jun; Vol. 19 (2), pp. 2290. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 17. |
DOI: | 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.2.2290 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Zika virus (ZIKV) infection emerged in Brazil in 2015, leading to the declaration of a national public health emergency, mainly due to its consequences for pregnant women and newborn babies. The Zika epidemic demanded major efforts from the public health system to address the full range of disease consequences. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the role of Primary Health Care pharmacists working in the city of Campo Grande in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul. Methods: A qualitative cross-sectional interview-based study with pharmacists working in municipal Primary Health Care services was carried out to investigate knowledge about the disease and involvement in the response to the health emergency. Informed consent was obtained. After coding, the corpus underwent thematic analysis. Results: The data show that few professionals had received specific training in public health. Knowledge largely encompassed disease transmission by the mosquito and collective and individual preventive measures. Findings highlight knowledge gaps relating to signs and symptoms, diagnosis, consequences of infection, and the role of epidemiological surveillance. Most professionals mentioned at least one of the recommendations on the use of medicines in symptom management protocols. The practical implications surrounding knowledge gaps and misconceptions were reflected in pharmacists´ role in response, restricted to counselling on preventive measures. Few respondents participated in institutional groups and committees or in multiprofessional teams involving case management. Conclusions: The study identified important knowledge gaps and showed that the involvement of pharmacy professionals in the response to the Zika epidemic was timid or inadequate. The results also suggest that pharmacists failed to recognize their role in interventions related to the ZIKV epidemic. Findings highlight the need to increase the involvement of primary care pharmacists in community-based actions, for communication and reduction of health risks, and emergency preparedness and response. Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST None. (Copyright: © The Authors.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |