General practitioners' experiences of emergency care and treatment planning in England: a focus group study.

Autor: Huxley CJ; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK., Eli K; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK., Hawkes CA; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK., Perkins GD; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK., George R; St Christopher's Hospice, 51-59 Lawrie Park Road, London, SE26 6DZ, UK., Griffiths F; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. f.e.griffiths@warwick.ac.uk., Slowther AM; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC family practice [BMC Fam Pract] 2021 Jun 24; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 128. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 24.
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01486-w
Abstrakt: Background: Emergency Care and Treatment Plans are recommended for all primary care patients in the United Kingdom who are expected to experience deterioration of their health. The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) was developed to integrate resuscitation decisions with discussions about wider goals of care. It summarises treatment recommendations discussed and agreed between patients and their clinicians for a future emergency situation and was designed to meet the needs of different care settings. Our aim is to explore GPs' experiences of using ReSPECT and how it transfers across the primary care and secondary care interface.
Methods: We conducted five focus groups with GPs in areas being served by hospitals in England that have implemented ReSPECT. Participants were asked about their experience of ReSPECT, how they initiate ReSPECT-type conversations, and their experiences of ReSPECT-type recommendations being communicated across primary and secondary care. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using Thematic Analysis.
Results: GPs conceptualise ReSPECT as an end of life planning document, which is best completed in primary care. As an end of life care document, completing ReSPECT is an emotional process and conversations are shaped by what a 'good death' is thought to be. ReSPECT recommendations are not always communicated or transferable across care settings. A focus on the patient's preferences around death, and GPs' lack of specialist knowledge, could be a barrier to completion of ReSPECT that is transferable to acute settings.
Conclusion: Conceptualising ReSPECT as an end of life care document suggests a difference in how general practitioners understand ReSPECT from its designers. This impacts on the transferability of ReSPECT recommendations to the hospital setting.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: