Advancing estuarine ecological forecasts: seasonal hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay.
Autor: | Scavia D; School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103, USA., Bertani I; Chesapeake Bay Program Office, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Annapolis, Maryland, 21403, USA., Testa JM; Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, Maryland, 20688, USA., Bever AJ; ANCHOR QEA, LLC, San Francisco, California, 94111, USA., Blomquist JD; U.S. Geological Survey, Water Observing Systems Program, Baltimore, Maryland, 21228, USA., Friedrichs MAM; William & Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia, 23062, USA., Linker LC; U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, 21403, USA., Michael BD; Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, USA., Murphy RR; Chesapeake Bay Program Office, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Annapolis, Maryland, 21403, USA., Shenk GW; U.S. Geological Survey Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, 21403, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America [Ecol Appl] 2021 Sep; Vol. 31 (6), pp. e02384. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 21. |
DOI: | 10.1002/eap.2384 |
Abstrakt: | Ecological forecasts are quantitative tools that can guide ecosystem management. The coemergence of extensive environmental monitoring and quantitative frameworks allows for widespread development and continued improvement of ecological forecasting systems. We use a relatively simple estuarine hypoxia model to demonstrate advances in addressing some of the most critical challenges and opportunities of contemporary ecological forecasting, including predictive accuracy, uncertainty characterization, and management relevance. We explore the impacts of different combinations of forecast metrics, drivers, and driver time windows on predictive performance. We also incorporate multiple sets of state-variable observations from different sources and separately quantify model prediction error and measurement uncertainty through a flexible Bayesian hierarchical framework. Results illustrate the benefits of (1) adopting forecast metrics and drivers that strike an optimal balance between predictability and relevance to management, (2) incorporating multiple data sources in the calibration data set to separate and propagate different sources of uncertainty, and (3) using the model in scenario mode to probabilistically evaluate the effects of alternative management decisions on future ecosystem state. In the Chesapeake Bay, the subject of this case study, we find that average summer or total annual hypoxia metrics are more predictable than monthly metrics and that measurement error represents an important source of uncertainty. Application of the model in scenario mode suggests that absent watershed management actions over the past decades, long-term average hypoxia would have increased by 7% compared to 1985. Conversely, the model projects that if management goals currently in place to restore the Bay are met, long-term average hypoxia would eventually decrease by 32% with respect to the mid-1980s. (© 2021 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |