Comparison of effectiveness of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilization in patients with non-specific neck pain.
Autor: | Manzoor A; Gulab Devi Chest Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan., Anwar N; Riphah International University, Lahore Campus, Pakistan., Khalid K; Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore, Pakistan., Haider R; Department of Physiotherapy, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan., Saghir M; Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore, Pakistan., Javed MA; Riphah International University, Lahore Campus, Pakistan. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association [J Pak Med Assoc] 2021 Jun; Vol. 71 (6), pp. 1532-1524. |
DOI: | 10.47391/JPMA.981 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: To compare the efficacy of muscle energy technique with Mulligan mobilisation in patients having non-specific neck pain. Methods: The quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from March to September 2017, and comprised patients of either gender having non-specific neck pain who ere divided into two groups. In group 1 patients, muscle energy technique was used, while group 2 patients had Mulligan mobilisation. Pain intensity, functional status of neck and cervical range of motion were measured before and after treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. Results: Of the 56 patients, 28(50%) were in each of the two groups. The overall mean age was 36.89±9.28 years. Pain intensity, functional status and neck extension range of motion improved significantly more in group 2 (p<0.05). Conclusions: Mulligan mobilisation was found to be a better option in managing patients with non-specific neck pain. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |