Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review.
Autor: | Koh WQ; National University of Ireland Galway, H91 E3YV, Galway, Ireland. weiqi.koh@nuigalway.ie., Felding SA; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Witten, Stockumer Str. 12, 58452, Witten, Germany., Budak KB; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Witten, Stockumer Str. 12, 58452, Witten, Germany., Toomey E; University of Limerick, V94 T9PX, Limerick, Ireland., Casey D; National University of Ireland Galway, H91 E3YV, Galway, Ireland. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | BMC geriatrics [BMC Geriatr] 2021 Jun 09; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 351. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 09. |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12877-021-02277-9 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Psychosocial issues, such as social isolation and loneliness among older adults and people with dementia, continue to pose challenges with a rapidly aging population worldwide. Social robots are a rapidly emerging field of technology, developed to help address the psychosocial needs of this population. Although studies have reported positive findings regarding their psychosocial benefits, their implementation in real-world practice remains a challenge. Nevertheless, little is known about the factors affecting their implementation. The purpose of this review is to provide a systematic overview of the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia. Method: The Arksey and O'Malley approach with methodological enhancement by Levac et al. was used to guide the conduct of this review. Seven electronic databases were searched. In addition, hand searching and backward citation tracing was conducted. Three independent reviewers were involved in the screening and data charting process. Findings were synthesised and categorised into the five domains outlined in the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research (CFIR). Results: A total of 53 studies were included in the final review. Most of the included studies were based in participants' homes and in care facilities. Barriers and facilitators were mapped onto 18 constructs in the five domains of the CFIR. The most frequently cited barriers were mapped to the constructs within the domain of "Intervention characteristics", where issues such as the complexity of using the technology and technical obstacles impeded implementation. Most facilitators were mapped onto the domain "Patient needs and resources". Overall, existing research are disproportionately focused on the internal validity (i.e. characteristics) of social robots, and there is significantly less research investigating their external validity, such as organisational or wider contextual factors that can affect their implementation in real-world practice. Conclusion: This review has identified and synthesised the breadth of evidence on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia. Future research should pay more attention to investigating the contextual factors, using an implementation framework, to identify barriers and facilitators to guide the implementation of social robots. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |