Postnatal Exercise Partners Study (PEEPS): a pilot randomized trial of a dyadic physical activity intervention for postpartum mothers and a significant other.
| Autor: | Carr RM; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.; Physical Activity and Well-being Research Group, Curtin University, Perth, Australia., Quested E; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; Physical Activity and Well-being Research Group, Curtin University, Perth, Australia., Stenling A; Department of Psychology, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden., Thøgersen-Ntoumani C; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; Physical Activity and Well-being Research Group, Curtin University, Perth, Australia., Prestwich A; School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK., Gucciardi DF; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; Physical Activity and Well-being Research Group, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia., McVeigh J; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; School of Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, Australia., Ntoumanis N; School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.; Physical Activity and Well-being Research Group, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Health psychology and behavioral medicine [Health Psychol Behav Med] 2021 Apr 07; Vol. 9 (1), pp. 251-284. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 07. |
| DOI: | 10.1080/21642850.2021.1902815 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Research suggests dyadic interventions can increase physical activity; such interventions are untested within postpartum parent couples. Methods: A three-armed pilot randomized trial addressed this gap and tested which type of dyadic intervention is most effective. Inactive postpartum mothers and a significant other were recruited in Australia ( n = 143 assessed for eligibility) and randomised in a single-blinded fashion (i.e. participants were blinded) to 1 of 3 dyadic conditions involving a single face-to-face session with access to web-based group support: a minimal treatment control ( n = 34), collaborative planning group ( n = 38), or collaborative planning + need supportive communication group ( n = 30). Participants were asked to wear their accelerometers for 8 days and completed self-report measures at baseline, end of intervention (week 4), and follow-up (week 12). We expected dyads in the collaborative planning + need supportive communication group would have the greatest increases in Physical Activity (PA), autonomous motivation, and partners' need supportive behaviours; and decreases in controlled motivation and controlling partner behaviours. Results: Results from 51 dyads using Bayesian actor-partner interdependence models provided some evidence for a small positive effect on total PA at follow-up for postpartum mothers in the collaborative planning group and for partners in the collaborative planning + need supportive communication group. Furthermore, partners in the collaborative planning + need supportive communication group were more likely to engage in some vigorous PA. At follow-up, postpartum mothers in the collaborative planning + need supportive communication group scored lower on personal autonomous reasons. Conclusions: The impact of prior specification mean intervention effects need to be interpreted with caution. Progression to a full trial is warranted. Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).This study was approved by the ethics board at Curtin University, Western Australia, approval number HRE2017-0045-04. (© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|