Education, Ethics, and History: The Peer Review Process in the US.
| Autor: | Richmond BK; Department of Surgery, Charleston Division, West Virginia University, Charleston, WV; Charleston Area Medical Center Institute for Academic Medicine, Charleston, WV. Electronic address: brichmond@hsc.wvu.edu., Welsh D; Surgical Associates of Southeastern Indiana, Batesville, IN. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American College of Surgeons [J Am Coll Surg] 2021 Sep; Vol. 233 (3), pp. 480-486. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 29. |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.025 |
| Abstrakt: | Despite the near-universal acceptance of the benefits of a sound peer review process (PRP), the topic of peer review remains a source of controversy among surgeons. The current PRP is plagued by heterogeneity across different hospital and institutional systems. These inconsistencies, combined with a perceived lack of fairness inherent to the PRP in some institutions, led to concerns among practicing surgeons. In this review of the relevant literature on the PRP, we attempted to provide some context and insight into the history of the PRP, its role, its shortcomings, its potential abuses, and some key requirements for its successful execution. (Copyright © 2021 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|