EFAS Score -Validation of Persian Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).
Autor: | Richter M; Head and core member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Agren PH; Core member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Besse JL; Core member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Coester M; Core member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Kofoed H; Core member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Maffulli N; Core member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Steultjens M; Outcome measure development expert and core member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Vosoughi AR; National affiliate member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France., Bahari M; National affiliate member, Score Committee European Foot and Ankle Society, c/o European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS), Marseille, France. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons [Foot Ankle Surg] 2021 Jul; Vol. 27 (5), pp. 496-500. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 18. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.006 |
Abstrakt: | Background: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in nine European languages (English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Turkish). From other languages under validation, the Persian version finished data acquisition and underwent further validation. Methods: The Persian version of the EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of Persian version (completed during initial validation study in nine other languages). The data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory. Results: The internal consistency was confirmed in the Persian version (Cronbach's Alpha 0.82). The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was 0.38 and is similar to other language versions. Between baseline and follow-up, 97% of patients showed an improvement on their EFAS score, with excellent responsiveness (effect size 1.93). Conclusions: The Persian EFAS Score version was successfully validated in patients with a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.co. (Copyright © 2021 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |