Decisions and Consequences: Validation of High-Stakes Simulation-Based Assessments in Gynecologic Surgery.

Autor:	LeClaire EL; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (Dr. LeClaire). Electronic address: Edgar-LeClaire@ouhsc.edu., Destephano CC; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida (Dr. Destephano)., Lerner VT; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York (Dr. Lerner)., Chen CCG; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr. Chen).
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of minimally invasive gynecology [J Minim Invasive Gynecol] 2021 Jul; Vol. 28 (7), pp. 1285-1290. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 23.
DOI:	10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.013
Abstrakt:	Study Objective: Simulation-based assessment is poised for application in educational promotion and credentialing in gynecologic surgery. With high-stakes assessment, validation necessitates evidence, not just about the trustworthiness of decisions but of beneficial consequences to education and healthcare as well. In this paper, we unpack the modern conceptualization of validity as it pertains to surgical simulation and high-stakes competency assessment. Design: N/A SETTING: N/A PATIENTS: N/A INTERVENTIONS: N/A MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: N/A CONCLUSION: Validity in high-stakes simulation-based assessment necessitates evidence, not just about the trustworthiness of score-based decisions but of beneficial consequences to education and healthcare as well. (Copyright © 2021 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu