Failure of leadership in U.S. academic medicine after George Floyd's killing by police and amidst subsequent unrest.

Autor: Kiang MV; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA., Tsai AC; Center for Global Health and Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: actsai@partners.org.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Annals of epidemiology [Ann Epidemiol] 2022 Jan; Vol. 65, pp. 116-119. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 21.
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.018
Abstrakt: The horrific nature of George Floyd's killing by a Minneapolis Police Department officer on May 25, 2020 sparked an enduring stretch of nationwide protests against police brutality and in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. During periods of crisis, anchor institutions may exert leadership by issuing public statements to communicate shared institutional values, enhance morale, and signal direction in the face of crisis. In our analysis of public statements issued by 56 leading U.S. medical schools, we found that nearly all identified George Floyd by name, and a majority noted the role of racism or acknowledged the Black community specifically. Fewer referenced the act resulting in Floyd's death or made explicit reference to the police. Far fewer explicitly used terms denoting active support, like "antiracism" or "Black Lives Matter." Only a minority of institutions made reference to the killing of George Floyd by the police, and most failed to address this country's targeted, historically engrained, and sustained oppression of Black people through white supremacy. Thus, there remain significant opportunities for U.S. medical schools to exert meaningful leadership in public health.
(Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: