Analysis of Falls Efficacy Scale and Vulnerable Elders Survey as Predictors of Falls.

Autor:	Greenberg M; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Jacoby J; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Barraco RD; Department of Surgery, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Yazdanyar AR; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Surmaitis RM; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Youngdahl A; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Chow RB; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Murillo SM; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Zeng AH; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA., Kane BG; Department of Emergency and Hospital Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Cureus [Cureus] 2021 Apr 13; Vol. 13 (4), pp. e14471. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 13.
DOI:	10.7759/cureus.14471
Abstrakt:	Introduction Falls are the leading cause of injury-related death among older adults according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and Vulnerable Elder Survey (VES-13) are validated screening tools used to assess concern of falling, health deterioration and functional decline. We set out to determine if the FES or VES-13 could serve as a predictor of falls among older adults in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. Methods This prospective pilot cohort study was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center. ED patients aged ≥65 were eligible for the study if they had a mechanical fall risk defined by CDC criteria. After consent and enrollment, FES and the VES surveys were completed. Participants were followed by phone quarterly, and results of the one-year follow-up self-report of fall history described.  Results There were 200 subjects enrolled and after excluding those that were withdrawn, deceased, or lost to follow-up, 184 were available for analysis of their follow-up visit at 12 months. A greater proportion of the participants were women (108 (58.7%) vs 76 (41.3%); P=0.88). The average age of the study participants was 74.2±7.3 years. There was no significant difference in age between men and women (median: 73 vs 73; p=0.47).  At the follow-up visit, 33 (17.9%) had a reported fall. The mean age did not significantly differ when comparing those with versus without a fall (75.6 vs 73.9; p=0.24). There was no significant difference in the proportion with a VES-13 ≥ 3 when comparing those with and without a reported fall (45.5% vs 37.8%; p = 0.41). The median FES score did not differ among those with as compared to without a fall (11 vs 10; p=0.12). Conclusions Subjects who had a VES-13 score of ≥3 were statistically no more likely to have fallen than those with a score of <3. Additionally, the FES score did not statistically differ when comparing those who had fallen to those who had not. Further research into alternative screening methods in the ED setting for fall risk is recommended. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. (Copyright © 2021, Greenberg et al.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu