Early procedural training increases anesthesiology residents' clinical production: a comparative pre-post study of the payoff in clinical training.

Autor: Bisgaard CH; Centre for Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 82, Building B, DK-8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. tigerthygesen@gmail.com., Rodt SA; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark., Musaeus P; Centre for Educational Development, Aarhus University, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 82, Building B, DK-8200, Aarhus N, Denmark., Petersen JAK; Department of Anaesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark., Rubak SLM; Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC medical education [BMC Med Educ] 2021 May 06; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 262. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 06.
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02693-w
Abstrakt: Background: Competency-based education has been shown to enhance clinical skills, improve patient care, and reduce number of complications resulting in a better return on investments. Residents constitute an important workforce at many hospitals. Yet, the effect of training on residents' contribution to production in patient care is scarcely studied. This study evaluated the effects of early competency-based procedural training on residents' contribution to patient care in central venous catheterization and spinal and epidural anesthesia.
Methods: The design was a non-randomized cohort study of first-year anesthesiology residents. The intervention group received additional early focused skills training while three control groups received traditional competency-based education. The residents' contributions to patient care were compared between the intervention group (n = 20), a historical control group (n = 19), and between a contemporary control group (n = 7) and a historical control group (n = 7) from different departments. The residents' vs specialists' procedural production share was compared between years within each study group. We calculated specialist time saved compared to the time spent providing additional skills training in the intervention group.
Results: We found statistically significant increases in residents' vs specialists' share of total production after the intervention for epidural anesthesia: 2015: 0.51 (0.23, 0.70) to 2017: 0.94 (0.78, 1.05), p = 0.011 and central venous catheterization: 2015: 0.30 (0.23, 0.36) to 2016: 0.46 (0.35, 0.55), p = .008; and to 2017: 0.64 (0.50, 0.79), p = 0.008. Comparison between residents and specialists on production of the three procedures before and after the intervention showed a surplus of 21 h of freed specialist time per year.
Conclusions: Early procedural training results in more productive residents and freed specialist time for additional supervision, other clinical tasks or research. This provides empirical support for a positive correlation between early focused training and increased independent production among residents.
Databáze: MEDLINE