Current Interventional Radiology-Related Benchmarked Clinical Quality Measures Are Less Likely to be "Capped" Than Diagnostic Radiology Clinical Quality Measures.
| Autor: | Noor M; Advent Health, Orlando, Florida., Bivins E; Advent Health, Orlando, Florida., Manchec B; Advent Health, Orlando, Florida., Contreras F; Advent Health, Orlando, Florida., Shah R; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California., Ward TJ; Advent Health, Orlando, Florida. Electronic address: thomasjward@gmail.com. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR [J Vasc Interv Radiol] 2021 May; Vol. 32 (5), pp. 677-682. |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.11.016 |
| Abstrakt: | In the merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS), quality measures are considered topped out if national median performance rates are ≥95%. Quality measures worth 10 points can be capped at 7 points if topped out for ≥2 years. This report compares the availability of diagnostic radiology (DR)-related and interventional radiology (IR)-related measures worth 10 points. A total of 196 MIPS clinical quality measures were reviewed on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services MIPS website. There are significantly more IR-related measures worth 10 points than DR measures (2/9 DR measures vs 9/12 IR measures; P = .03), demonstrating that clinical IR services can help mixed IR/DR groups maximize their Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services payment adjustment. (Copyright © 2020 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|