Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant.

Autor:	Jayasinghe G; Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, Kent, UK., Buckle C; Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, Kent, UK., Maling LC; Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, Kent, UK., To C; Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, Kent, UK., Anibueze C; Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, Kent, UK., Vinayakam P; Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, Kent, UK., Slack R; Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, Kent, UK.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Arthroplasty today [Arthroplast Today] 2021 Apr 05; Vol. 8, pp. 181-187. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 05 (Print Publication: 2021).
DOI:	10.1016/j.artd.2021.02.017
Abstrakt:	Background: The rate of revision hip arthroplasty surgery is rising. Surgeons must use implants with proven outcomes to help overcome the technical challenges faced during revision surgery. However, outcome studies using these implants are limited. The aim of this study is to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the Stryker Restoration stem, the most commonly used hip revision stem in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods: A retrospective review of a single surgeon case series was performed. Immediate postoperative radiographs were analyzed for offset and leg length discrepancy. Radiographic evidence of subsidence was assessed using follow-up radiographs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied using explantation and reoperation as endpoints. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Oxford Hip Score and EQ-5D-5L. Results: One hundred ninety-eight cases were identified. Mean follow-up duration was 51.8 months (range: 24-121). Stem survival during this period was 98%. Reoperation for any reason was 13%. Mean subsidence was 4.18 mm. Analysis of variance testing showed no difference in mean subsidence between revision indications. Mean offset and leg length discrepancies were measured at 4.5 mm and 4.3 mm, respectively. The mean Oxford Hip Score for participants was 27.6. Conclusions: This series demonstrates excellent implant survival, with radiographic parameters for reconstruction and subsidence levels comparable to those in the existing literature. The tapered modular hip revision stem provides surgeons with the intraoperative flexibility to overcome some of the anatomical difficulties encountered during revision surgery; this is reflected in the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the cohort in this study. (Crown Copyright © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu