Psychiatric hospital reform in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of literature.

Autor: Raja T; Tata Trusts, World Trade Center, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, 400005, India. tasneemraja@gmail.com.; Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. tasneemraja@gmail.com., Tuomainen H; Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England., Madan J; Centre for Health Economics, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England., Mistry D; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, England., Jain S; Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560029, India., Easwaran K; Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.; Founder Sumunum Foundation, Chennai, India., Singh SP; Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology [Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol] 2021 Aug; Vol. 56 (8), pp. 1341-1357. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 21.
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02075-z
Abstrakt: Purpose: Psychiatric hospitals or mental asylums grew across the world in the colonial era. Despite concerns over quality of care and human rights violations, these hospitals continue to provide the majority of mental health care in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We sought to review the evidence of reform of mental hospitals and associated patient outcomes.
Methods: We adopted an integrative review methodology by including experimental and non-experimental research. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019130399). A range of databases and systematic hand searches were conducted by two independent reviewers. Research conducted between 1980 and May 2019, that focused on any aspect of reform in mental hospitals for adults (age 18 and upwards) with severe mental illness and published in English, were considered.
Results: 16 studies were included in the review. 12 studies met inclusion criteria, and four additional reports emerged from the hand search. Studies covered-India, China, South Africa, Grenada, Georgia, Sri Lanka, Argentina and Brazil. Key findings emphasise the role of judicial intervention as a critical trigger of reform. Structural reform composed of optimisation of resources and renovations of colonial structures to cater to diverse patient needs. Process reforms include changes in medical management, admission processes and a move from closed to open wards. Staff engagement and capacity building have also been used as a modality of reform in mental hospital settings.
Conclusion: There is some documentation of reform in psychiatric hospitals. However, poor methodological quality and variation in approach and outcomes measured, make it challenging to extrapolate specific findings on process or outcomes of reform. Despite being integral service providers, psychiatric hospitals still do not adopt patient centric, recovery-oriented processes. Hence, there is an urgent need to generate robust evidence on psychiatric reform and its effect on patient outcomes.
(© 2021. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje