Bricker ileal conduit vs. Cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review.

Autor:	Korkes F; Divisão de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil.; Hospital Municipal da Vila Santa Catarina, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil., Fernandes E; Divisão de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil., Gushiken FA; Divisão de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil., Glina FPA; Divisão de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil., Baccaglini W; Divisão de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil.; Hospital Municipal da Vila Santa Catarina, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil., Timóteo F; Divisão de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil.; Hospital Municipal da Vila Santa Catarina, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brasil., Glina S; Divisão de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology [Int Braz J Urol] 2022 Jan-Feb; Vol. 48 (1), pp. 18-30.
DOI:	10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0892
Abstrakt:	Purpose: A systematic review of the literature with available published literature to compare ileal conduit (IC) and cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) urinary diversions (UD) in terms of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of high-risk elderly patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). Protocol Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42020168851. Materials and Methods: A systematic review, according to the PRISMA Statement, was performed. Search through the Medline, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, and Cochrane Database until July 2020. Results: The literature search yielded 2,883 citations and were selected eight studies, including 1096 patients. A total of 707 patients underwent IC and 389 CU. Surgical procedures and outcomes, complications, mortality, and quality of life were analyzed. Conclusions: CU seems to be a safe alternative for the elderly and more frail patients. It is associated with faster surgery, less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, a lower necessity of intensive care, and shorter hospital stay. According to most studies, complications are less frequent after CU, even though mortality rates are similar. Studies with long-term follow up are awaited. Competing Interests: None declared. (Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu