Autor: |
Kibby MY; School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, USA., Newsham G; School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, USA., Imre Z; School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, USA., Schlak JE; School of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale, Carbondale, IL, USA. |
Jazyk: |
angličtina |
Zdroj: |
Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence [Child Neuropsychol] 2021 Oct; Vol. 27 (7), pp. 888-910. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 13. |
DOI: |
10.1080/09297049.2021.1908532 |
Abstrakt: |
Our study is one of the few to analyze executive functioning (EF) in a comprehensive, multi-modal fashion as a potential contributor to the comorbidity between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and basic reading disability (RD). We included multiple, traditional, neuropsychological measures of EF, along with the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) questionnaire, to assess inhibit, shift, working memory (WM), planning, generation fluency, and problem-solving. Participants included 263 children, ages 8-12 years, with RD, ADHD, RD/ADHD, and typically developing controls. When using the traditional measures in a 2 × 2 MANCOVA, we found both RD and ADHD had poor cognitive EF in most areas at the group level, with phonological loop deficits being more specific to RD and behavioral regulation deficits being more specific to ADHD. Children with RD/ADHD performed comparably to those with RD and ADHD alone. Results were similar on the BRIEF. In contrast, only WM predicted both basic reading and inattention when the data were assessed in a continuous fashion. It also explained the correlations between basic reading and inattention, being worthy of longitudinal research to determine if it is a shared contributor to RD/ADHD. When comparing hypotheses as to the nature of RD/ADHD, we found the multiple deficit hypothesis was better supported by our EF data than the phenocopy hypothesis or the cognitive subtype hypothesis. |
Databáze: |
MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |
|