Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws.

Autor: Dyrna FGE; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany. felix.dyrna@icloud.com., Avery DM 3rd; OrthoSports Associates Upper Extremity Surgeon, Birmingham, AL, USA., Yoshida R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA., Lam D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA., Oeckenpöhler S; Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany., Cote MP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA., Obopilwe E; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA., Rodner CM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA., Mazzocca AD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: BMC musculoskeletal disorders [BMC Musculoskelet Disord] 2021 Apr 07; Vol. 22 (1), pp. 335. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 07.
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04200-0
Abstrakt: Background: Metacarpal shaft fractures are common and can be treated nonoperatively. Shortening, angulation, and rotational deformity are indications for surgical treatment. Various forms of treatment with advantages and disadvantages have been documented. The purpose of the study was to determine the stability of fracture fixation with intramedullary headless compression screws in two types of metacarpal shaft fractures and compare them to other common forms of rigid fixation: dorsal plating and lag screw fixation. It was hypothesized that headless compression screws would demonstrate a biomechanical stronger construct.
Methods: Five matched paired hands (age 60.9 ± 4.6 years), utilizing non-thumb metacarpals, were used for comparative fixation in two fracture types created by an osteotomy. In transverse diaphyseal fractures, fixation by headless compression screws (n = 7) and plating (n = 8) were compared. In long oblique diaphyseal fractures, headless compression screws (n = 8) were compared with plating (n = 8) and lag screws (n = 7). Testing was performed using an MTS frame producing an apex dorsal, three point bending force. Peak load to failure and stiffness were calculated from the load-displacement curve generated.
Results: For transverse fractures, headless compression screws had a significantly higher stiffness and peak load to failure, means 249.4 N/mm and 584.8 N, than plates, means 129.02 N/mm and 303.9 N (both p < 0.001). For long oblique fractures, stiffness and peak load to failure for headless compression screws were means 209 N/mm and 758.4 N, for plates 258.7 N/mm and 518.5 N, and for lag screws 172.18 N/mm and 234.11 N. There was significance in peak load to failure for headless compression screws vs plates (p = 0.023), headless compression screws vs lag screws (p < 0.001), and plates vs lag screws (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in stiffness between groups.
Conclusion: Intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal metacarpal fractures with a headless compression screw provides excellent biomechanical stability. Coupled with lower risks for adverse effects, headless compression screws may be a preferable option for those requiring rapid return to sport or work.
Level of Evidence: Basic Science Study, Biomechanics.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: