Eye-tracking-based visual field analysis (EFA): a reliable and precise perimetric methodology for the assessment of visual field defects.

Autor:	Leitner MC; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria., Hutzler F; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria., Schuster S; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria., Vignali L; Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.; International School for Advanced Studies, Trieste, Italy., Marvan P; Eye Clinic Dr. Patrick Marvan, Salzburg, Austria., Reitsamer HA; University Hospital Salzburg for Ophthalmology and Optometry, Salzburg, Austria., Hawelka S; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open ophthalmology [BMJ Open Ophthalmol] 2021 Mar 17; Vol. 6 (1), pp. e000429. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 17 (Print Publication: 2021).
DOI:	10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000429
Abstrakt:	Objective: Several studies report evidence for training-related neuroplasticity in the visual cortex, while other studies suggest that improvements simply reflect inadequate eye fixation control during perimetric prediagnostics and postdiagnostics. Methods and Analysis: To improve diagnostics, a new eye-tracking-based methodology for visual field analysis (eye-tracking-based visual field analysis (EFA)) was developed. The EFA is based on static automated perimetry and additionally takes individual eye movements in real time into account and compensates for them. In the present study, an evaluation of the EFA with the help of blind spots of 58 healthy participants and the individual visual field defects of 23 clinical patients is provided. With the help of the EFA, optical coherence tomography, Goldmann perimetry and a Humphrey field analyser, these natural and acquired scotomas were diagnosed and the results were compared accordingly. Results: The EFA provides a SE of measurement of 0.38° for the right eye (OD) and 0.50° for the left eye (OS), leading to 0.44° of visual angle for both eyes (OU). Based on participants' individual results, the EFA provides disattenuated correlation (validity) of 1.00 for both OD and OS. Results from patients suffering from cortical lesions and glaucoma further indicate that the EFA is capable of diagnosing acquired scotoma validly and is applicable for clinical use. Conclusion: Outcomes indicate that the EFA is highly reliable and precise in diagnosing individual shape and location of scotoma and capable of recording changes of visual field defects (after intervention) with unprecedented precision. Test duration is comparable to established instruments and due to the high customisability of the EFA, assessment duration can be shortened by adapting the diagnostic procedure to the patients' individual visual field characteristics. Therefore, the saccade-compensating methodology enables researchers and healthcare professionals to rule out eye movements as a source of inaccuracies in pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu