Rotational alignment of corneal endothelial grafts and risk of graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a double-masked pseudo-randomized study.

Autor: Fritz M; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Grewing V; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Gruber M; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Wagner H; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Zander D; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Lapp T; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Lang SJ; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Heinzelmann-Mink S; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Maier PC; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Reinhard T; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Wacker K; Eye Centre, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Acta ophthalmologica [Acta Ophthalmol] 2021 Dec; Vol. 99 (8), pp. e1334-e1339. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 19.
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14849
Abstrakt: Purpose: The posterior cornea is rotationally asymmetric, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts preferentially scroll vertically. This prospective study assessed whether graft attachment after DMEK differed depending on the rotational alignment of the donor graft in the recipient eye.
Methods: Pseudo-randomization and blinding of the graft orientation in the recipient's eye were possible by procedural separation: (1) The eye bank recorded the position of an orientation marker in the donor cornea; (2) the surgeon preparing the DMEK graft recorded an upside-down marker relative to the eye bank marker; and (3) the surgeon assessed the position of the upside-down marker in the recipient after DMEK. Surgeons were masked towards the eye bank marker. Using mixed-effects models, we assessed graft attachment relative to the rotational alignment of the donor graft.
Results: Postoperatively, the graft was not fully attached in 59 of 179 eyes (33%). A second air fill (rebubbling) was performed in 11%. The graft axis was in line with the recipient cornea axis in 40%, oblique in 28% and orthogonal in 32%. We did not detect an elevated risk of incomplete attachment (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.61-2.20), risk of rebubbling (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.47-3.31) or larger areas of graft detachment in non-aligned grafts compared to aligned grafts.
Conclusion: Rotational alignment was not strongly associated with the risk of incomplete graft attachment, although modestly elevated risks cannot be ruled out. Efforts are needed to reduce the need for rebubbling after DMEK and to identify modifiable risk factors for graft detachment.
(© 2021 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje