Root coverage of multiple gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap associated with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix or connective tissue graft: a 6-month split-mouth controlled and randomized clinical trial.

Autor: Maluta R; Implantology and Periodontology, São Leopoldo Mandic Research Institute, R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, 13 - Pte. Preta, Campinas, SP, 13045-755, Brazil., Monteiro MF; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901 - Areião, Piracicaba, SP, 13414-903, Brazil., Peruzzo DC; Implantology and Periodontology, São Leopoldo Mandic Research Institute, R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, 13 - Pte. Preta, Campinas, SP, 13045-755, Brazil., Joly JC; Implantology and Periodontology, São Leopoldo Mandic Research Institute, R. Dr. José Rocha Junqueira, 13 - Pte. Preta, Campinas, SP, 13045-755, Brazil. joly@implanteperio.com.br.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2021 Oct; Vol. 25 (10), pp. 5765-5773. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 15.
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03879-8
Abstrakt: Objectives: This study aimed to compare xenogeneic dermal matrix (XDM) to connective tissue graft (CTG) associated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) in treating Miller's class I and II (RT1) multiple gingival recession in a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with bilateral Miller's class I and II multiple recessions were selected. The patient's side receiving each treatment was randomly allocated to receive XDM or CTG. The clinical parameters were measured at baseline and 6 months of follow-up.
Results: At 6 months, no significant difference in the root coverage (RC) (95.28 ± 6.89% for CTG and 92.68 ± 7.35% for XDM) and the keratinized tissue (KT) gain (0.91 ± 0.46 mm for CTG and 0.74 ± 0.39 mm for XDM) was observed between groups (p > 0.05). The CTG group presented higher complete root coverage (CRC) than XDM (60% and 33%, respectively) (p = 0.045). Multiple logistic regression indicated that the XDM (p = 0.01) and the XDM and KT interaction (p = 0.02) negatively interfered in the CRC. A 1-mm increase in the baseline KT when using XDM increases almost 6 times the chance of achieving CRC, and XDM reached a similar CRC probability to CTG when the receptor area presented at least 2 mm of KT.
Conclusions: Both treatments were effective for treating multiple gingival recession; similar KT gain, GR reduction, and RC were obtained for CTG and XDM, while CTG promoted higher CRC than XDM. Moreover, the amount of KT at baseline was determinant for CRC when treating multiple gingival recession with XDM.
Clinical Relevance: XDM produces limited CRC in sites with a reduced amount of KT.
Trial Registration: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC) number RBR-56NZQ6.
(© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: