| Autor: |
Bengur FB; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA., Stoy C; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA., Binko MA; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA., Nerone WV; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA., Fedor CN; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA., Solari MG; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA., Marra KG; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
Injury to the facial nerve can occur after different etiologies and range from simple transection of the branches to varying degrees of segmental loss. Management depends on the extent of injury and options include primary repair for simple transections and using autografts, allografts, or conduits for larger gaps. Tissue engineering plays an important role to create artificial materials that are able to mimic the nerve itself without extra morbidity in the patients. The use of neurotrophic factors or stem cells inside the conduits or around the repair site is being increasingly studied to enhance neural recovery to a greater extent. Preclinical studies remain the hallmark for development of these novel approaches and translation into clinical practice. This review will focus on preclinical models of repair after facial nerve injury to help researchers establish an appropriate model to quantify recovery and analyze functional outcomes. Different bioengineered materials, including conduits and nerve grafts, will be discussed based on the experimental animals that were used and the defects introduced. Future directions to extend the applications of processed nerve allografts, bioengineered conduits, and cues inside the conduits to induce neural recovery after facial nerve injury will be highlighted. Impact statement Recovery after facial nerve injury is a complex process, which involves different management options such as primary repair or the use of nerve grafts or conduits. Various tissue-engineered approaches are increasingly studied on preclinical models with limited, but promising, translation to the clinical setting. Herein, preclinical models focusing on different recovery methods after facial nerve injury are comprehensively reviewed based on the experimental animals used. The review provides key insights into current developments and future directions on this highly relevant topic to help researchers further expand the field of tissue engineering and facial nerve recovery. |
