Assessment of global and regional PM 10 CAMSRA data: comparison to observed data in Morocco.

Autor: Sekmoudi I; Hassan II University of Casablanca, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Mohammedia (FSTM), Laboratory of Process Engineering and Environment, P.O. Box 146, 20650, Mohammedia, Morocco. imane.sekmoudi@gmail.com., Khomsi K; General Directorate of Meteorology, Face préfecture Hay Hassani, B.P. 8106 Casa-Oasis, Casablanca, Morocco., Faieq S; Univ.Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP (Institute of Engineering Univ. Grenoble Alpes), LIG, 3800, Grenoble, France.; LRIT Associated Unit to CNRST (URAC 29), Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, Morocco., Idrissi L; Hassan II University of Casablanca, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Mohammedia (FSTM), Laboratory of Process Engineering and Environment, P.O. Box 146, 20650, Mohammedia, Morocco.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Environmental science and pollution research international [Environ Sci Pollut Res Int] 2021 Jun; Vol. 28 (23), pp. 29984-29997. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 12.
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12783-3
Abstrakt: Given the strong impact of air quality on health, environment, and economy, Morocco has implemented an air quality network to assess air pollutants including PM 10 (particulate matter with a diameter less than 10 μm). This network which is composed of 29 fixed measurement stations is spatially limited and does not provide sufficient time resolution. The scarcity of measured air quality data led to seek an optimal alternative source to conduct related data-based studies. This represents the primary objective of this paper. PM 10 concentrations of global Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service Reanalysis (CAMSRA) data (4D Variational analysis "4v" and analysis "an"), as well as regional CAMSRA data, were examined against the average daily PM 10 concentrations collected from six fixed Moroccan air quality measurement stations in 2016 (i.e., observation data). The verification is carried out by studying and analyzing seasonal, extreme, and annual values. The study shows a strong seasonal dependence with a positive bias in winter and a negative bias during summer. For the study of extreme values, global CAMSRA "an" and "4v" data record significant bias of approximately 184 and 161 μg/m 3 , respectively. However, the annual analysis shows that the CAMSRA global "an" data have the smallest average bias (20.008 μg/m 3 ) and hence has the closest representation of observation data. We conclude that the CAMSRA global analysis data could be used to compute climatology, study trends, evaluate models, benchmark other reanalysis, or serve as boundary conditions for regional models for past periods.
Databáze: MEDLINE